AI operations for print companies
Agent Effects sits behind the artwork workflow you already use. Your deterministic preflight rules decide what is technically wrong. Agent Effects handles the repetitive customer back-and-forth around those findings, gets a corrected file, rechecks it, and keeps the job moving.
The wedge
Bad artwork should create a machine-handled exception, not another email thread for your prepress team.
[ 01 / The workflow ]
A customer submits artwork. Something is wrong. Finding the problem is only the start; the expensive part is the repeated coordination that follows.
Today
With Agent Effects
[ 02 / How it works ]
The important design choice is where the AI is allowed to make decisions, and where it is not.
01 / Existing customer journey
Website upload, ecommerce order, email, or another artwork entry point. Agent Effects receives the file together with the product and job context that determines which rules apply.
02 / Deterministic truth
Dimensions, resolution, bleed, transparency, named spot colours, overprint and other defined requirements are checked deterministically. An LLM does not improvise a production decision.
03 / Exception resolution
It explains the structured findings, requests a corrected file, answers questions from approved rules, follows up when needed and automatically rechecks replacement artwork.
04 / Existing prepress
When the configured checks pass, the file is released back into the workflow you already trust. Anything ambiguous or unusual is escalated to a human instead of guessed.
[ CUSTOMER ORDER / UPLOAD ]
Product + options + artwork
│
▼
[ DETERMINISTIC PREFLIGHT ]
Defined rules produce structured findings
│
┌────┴────┐
▼ ▼
PASS FAIL
│ │
│ ▼
│ [ AGENT EFFECTS ]
│ Explain → collect → follow up → recheck
│ │
└────┬────┘
▼
[ YOUR EXISTING PREPRESS / PRODUCTION WORKFLOW ]
[ 03 / Guardrails ]
Agent Effects can
Agent Effects cannot
[ 04 / Integration ]
The goal is not another portal or all-in-one print MIS. Agent Effects should disappear into the workflow you already have.
Customer side
Your customer still chooses the product, selects the options and uploads artwork where they already do today.
Agent Effects
Product, SKU, dimensions, finishing options, turnaround and other job data select the correct rule profile and keep the conversation tied to the right order.
Production side
Once the configured checks pass, the job goes back to your existing prepress, RIP, MIS or production workflow. Agent Effects does not replace the final production authority.
Existing upload / inbox → deterministic check → Agent Effects exception handling → existing prepress workflow.
[ 05 / Personalised demos ]
We're starting by building each initial demo around a real workflow the print company already publishes. Not a generic chatbot and not a pitch deck.
We look at how customers currently submit artwork, the product context and the technical requirements you already give customers. Then we reconstruct the smallest useful part of that journey and make the exception handling work.
No obligation. One workflow, one realistic exception, built around your existing process.
Example demo scenario
Two deterministic failures are explained to the customer. Corrected artwork is collected, checked again, then released back to the existing workflow.
[ 06 / Why Agent Effects ]
Right now we're starting with repetitive operational work inside print companies because the problems are concrete, measurable and valuable.
The longer-term direction is broader: increasingly capable software, AI and eventually robotics should remove more of the repetitive work humans still do because our systems are not good enough yet.
Machines handle the repetitive work. Humans keep the judgment.
[ 07 / FAQ ]
No. Defined technical requirements are evaluated deterministically. Agent Effects uses those structured findings to handle the conversation and workflow around an exception. Your existing authoritative prepress or production process remains in place.
That is specifically what we're trying to avoid. The preferred implementation sits behind the artwork entry point you already use, so customers keep using your existing product, upload or order flow.
The system escalates rather than inventing an answer. The handoff can include the order context, artwork findings and conversation so your team can resolve the unusual case without reconstructing everything from scratch.
Yes. The same principle applies, but the attachment first needs to be resolved to the correct order or job context. Where that cannot be determined safely, the system asks or escalates rather than guessing.
No. Agent Effects is designed to work around your existing deterministic tools and production process. The first target is the repetitive exception-resolution work that surrounds preflight failures.
Email us a link to the relevant product or artwork-requirements page. We'll choose one concrete workflow and build a small prototype around the rules you already publish.
One real workflow. Your existing rules.
Send me the product or artwork workflow that creates the most repetitive back-and-forth. I'll build a small prototype around your existing process so you can judge the idea on something concrete.